• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to main content

Ethan Demme

Thoughts and Policy for Building a Better Pennsylvania

  • Education Reform
  • Parental Engagement
  • Public Policy
  • Lifelong Learning
  • Lancaster County
  • Education Reform
  • Parental Engagement
  • Public Policy
  • Lifelong Learning
  • Lancaster County
  • Education Reform
  • Parental Engagement
  • Public Policy
  • Lifelong Learning
  • Lancaster County

education

STEM Teacher Training – Wilson Institute

October 24, 2015

woodrow

I recently had the privilege of meeting Dr. Arthur Levine, the sixth president of the Woodrow Wilson Foundation, at the 2015 PA Business Conference. Dr. Levine shared with me about his work at the Foundation which aims to increase the number of quality STEM teachers by working at the state and local level.

The Wilson Foundation was founded in 1945 as a response to “a shortage of college faculty at the conclusion of World War II by offering talented students the opportunity to attend doctoral programs and begin college teaching careers.” The Teaching Fellowship began in 2007 in the state of Indian and has expanded to Michigan, Ohio, New Jersey, and most recently Georgia. This fellowship has a two-fold goal: 1): increase the quantity of math and science teachers particularly in urban and rural settings and 2): to improve the quality of university-based teacher education.

I appreciate the excellent structure Fellowship program. Fellows are given money towards university tuition (masters degree) and in exchange make a commitment to teaching for at least three years in high-need areas within the state where they studied. The program matches these teachers with participating local schools and gives them intense mentoring from a mentor from the school in which they are teaching and a mentor from the university where they completed their master’s degree.

This program is remarkably effective. For example, in Indiana, the Foundation is producing 80 Fellows annually which is an increase of certified teachers by more than 30%. In addition, because the program develops strong ties with individual universities and schools at a local level, the program creates a sustainable impact on teacher education and teaching in each state.

A comprehensive assessment of the program also speaks to the success of the program. The assessment found that after the required three years, “Fellows have an 81%  retention rate in high-need schools. They are 1.9 times more likely to remain teachers than their peers. Achievement among their students is three to four months ahead of peers.”

Dr. Levine is leading a fantastic program and the model that Woodrow is based on is one worth studying and emulating. Change at the local and state level is not only more efficient, but it is also more cost-effective. The teaching fellowship, by its very design, is built for long-lasting effect.

To read more about the Wilson Foundation, visit their website. To learn more about the teaching fellowship specifically, click here.

Filed Under: Lifelong Learning Tagged With: education, local, stem

#EIE15 – Live-tweeting the 2015 National Summit on Education Reform

October 21, 2015

I am en route to Denver for the 2015 National Summit on Education Reform. I’ll be live-tweeting on Thursday and Friday. You can view the live-tweets below or just follow me on twitter and join in the conversation. @ethandemme

Tweets by @EthanDemme

Filed Under: Education Reform Tagged With: #eie15, education, excellined, national summit, reform

Preview of the 2015 National Summit on Education Reform

October 19, 2015

summit2015

I am getting ready to attend the 2015 National Summit on Education Reform in Denver Colorado. The theme for this year’s summit is Onward and Upward: Operation Student Success. Here are some of the sessions I am looking forward to attending:

Strategy Session 1 – Turn and Face the Strain: Problem and Solutions

This session will explore how coming demographic changes – impending retirement of the Baby Boomers and a population boom of school-age children – will lead to challenges in state funding. I reviewed the report on this data a few months ago: click here to read the review.

Strategy Session 4 - Communicating Student Data Privacy: Challenges and Opportunities

This session will explore the challenge of student data privacy and provide guidance on forming thoughtful policies. I recently took Foundation for Excellence in Education’s online course on Data Privacy. For an overview of this and two other courses, click here.

Strategy Session 5 - 2015: The Year of Education Savings Accounts

“Education Savings Accounts (ESAs) started as an experiment in 2011 to offer educational choice and customization in Arizona. Since then, the program has grown. Florida passed an ESA program in 2013, and this year three more states created programs and lawmakers filed ESA bills in nearly two-dozen states. Nevada, the latest state to create an ESA program, will soon have all 450,000 public school students eligible to participate.” (from the session description)

For an overview of Education Savings Accounts (what they are, how they work), click here. To read about Nevada’s implementation of ESAs, click here.

I will be live-tweeting from the event so be sure to follow me: @ethandemme

Filed Under: Education Reform Tagged With: education, education reform, school choice

EdPolicy Online Courses

September 25, 2015

Foundation_for_Excellence_in_EducationThe Foundation for Excellence in Education is a leading think-tank in the world of education reform. Leaders associated with the organization include former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and former Chancellor of the New York City Department of Education Joel Klein.

Recently, ExcelInEd launched three online courses – self-paced and free – on education policy. I have taken two of the three courses and benefited from the videos and assigned readings.

The first course was Securing Our Nation’s Future: The Urgent Need For Education Reform

A main reading resource: Turn and Face the Strain

The second class was Data Privacy? Get Schooled.

The third class is Communications Boot Camp Winning the Ed Reform Conversation

A main reading resource: 5 Essential Habits of the Network’s Top Communicators

All of these courses are highly informative and worth taking. Best of all,  these courses are student-paced so you can fit it around your schedule and get access to great information free of charge.

 

Filed Under: Education Reform Tagged With: education, excelined, reform

Democrat Candidates: Education Records

September 9, 2015

Democratic_Party_Logo

A recent post recent post highlighted statements and voting record on education (school choice and the role of parents) of GOP presidential candidates. If you haven’t read that post, you can read it by clicking here. Today, I want to look at the history/record of the Democrat presidential candidates as well as their personal history of education to see how they match (or don’t) with their statements.

Lincoln Chafee: is wary of charter schools [source] and one of his main advisers, Diane Ravitch, is a harsh critic of school choice education reform. [source] He attended elite prep schools, including Andover (where he was a schoolmate of Jeb Bush). He did his undergrad at Brown University but also attended Montana State University. His daughter Louisa also attended Brown University. [source]

Chafee is hard to pigeonhole but it seems that he is not a proponent of school choice and is most likely opposed to vouchers, charters schools, etc..

Hillary Clinton: is opposed to school vouchers but is supportive of charter school. [source] Clinton graduated from Maine South High School (public) and attended Wellesley College. Her daughter Chelsea attended the elite Sidwell Friends School and did her undergrad at Stanford University.

Clinton is a firm advocate for public schools but also supports parents and parental choice. Her perspective on school choice is mixed.

Martin O’Malley: As mayor of Maryland in 2014, he celebrated National School Choice Week. [source] He has supported charter schools and voucher systems. [source] He attended Our Lady of Lourdes Catholic School and Gonzaga College High School (Catholic, private) and did his undergrad at The Catholic University of America. Two daughters of O’Malley attended Georgetown University and College of Charleston [source] (previously attending Notre Dame prep school.)

O’Malley remains a proponent of school choice despite the general opposition of his party to school choice initiatives.

Bernie Sanders: is not a proponent of school choice and has opposed vouchers. [source] He graduated high school from James Madison High School (public) before doing his undergrad at the University of Chicago.

Sanders is opposed to school choice initiatives.

Jim Webb: is not a proponent of school choice and opposes vouchers. [source] He did his undergrad at University of Southern California. Webb’s children attended public school. [source]

Webb has not engaged with education reform in general but is opposed to school choice initiatives.

Filed Under: Education Reform Tagged With: 2016 election, education, politics

  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Go to page 4
  • Go to Next Page »
  • Education Reform
  • Parental Engagement
  • Public Policy
  • Lifelong Learning
  • Lancaster County

© 2023 Ethan Demme | PO Box 95 Lampeter, PA 17537